Saturday, January 30, 2016

Centennial Mills: Boondoggle or Iconic Landmark?

In 2000 the Portland Development Commission (PDC) purchased the four-acre Centennial Mills site for $12 million.  After two botched development proposals, PDC’s return on investment is approaching “boondoggle.” The PDC has paid out $550,000 to consultants after rejecting their plans.  This loss is not insurmountable, but the loss of trust just might be.  Harsch Investment Properties (HIP), which prepared the latest plan, was not allowed to gather public input. Jordan Schnitzer, who heads HIP, finally shared the firm’s vision with a crowded gathering in the Pearl District.  The presentation was well received, which only added to Schnitzer’s lament. “The city has lost its way,” he concluded.   

PDC once had direction.  In 2006, it funded a six-month public process that set the framework to turn Centennial Mills into a community focal point that captured history, embraced sustainability, complemented nearby parks, and provided connections to the waterfront. http://www.pdc.us/Libraries/River_District/Centennial_Mills_Framework_Plan-Feb_07-2007_pdf.sflb.ashx HIP's plan effectively integrated these points, but its $38 million subsidy was too much for PDC.  Schnitzer, a philanthropist rooted in the community, is not without hope.  He proposed moving the Oregon Historical Society to the site, an idea that foundations and corporations could support. It also has precedent.  

In 1944 after a scheme to develop Portland’s West Hills foundered, a Committee of 50 was formed to establish the “Forest Park” the Olmsted Brothers identified in their 1903 park plan. Four years later, Forest Park opened to the public.  Can history repeat itself?

Once again, the Olmsted Brothers offer guidance.  They warned against confining creeks to “large underground conduits at enormous expense” when they could provide “delightful local pleasure grounds.” Tanner Creek suffered this fate and its outflow abuts Centennial Mills.  Schnitzer’s team proposed restoring a portion of the riverine wetlands.  Revitalizing nature would strike a synergy with Tanner Springs Park, as its restored marsh recalls the natural pre-engineered landscape.  
Centennial Mills also has a rich cultural history. The mill business established Portland. Lucrative wheat exports turned a frontier settlement into a prosperous city, and this wealth procured a definitive civic realm that was progressively expanded.  Pioneer Courthouse, Olmsted parks, and the city’s sustainable environs are the product, historian Carl Abbott writes, of a “moralistic political culture that valued the public good over individuals.” 
Centennial Mills should tell this story.  It would make the perfect bookend to Portland State, a center of civic education that celebrates the past and envisions the future.  As the world becomes more urban, retrofitting abandoned industrial properties is essential, and   Centennial Mills would be Portland’s exclamation mark.

Access is the key.  Plans exist to bridge the railroad, and the structure, like New York City’s High Line, should provide pedestrians with a visceral experience.  In addition, students could walk from Jamison Square to the Willamette River and learn how wetlands were transformed into a rail yard and then an urban neighborhood, where wealth and poverty co-exist.  Despite its reputation, 33% of the Pearl District’s residents earn less than $25,000 annually (the city average is 25%).

It’s time for a public discussion. In the meantime, Mr. Schnitzer could secure a new Committee of 50 to rescue a fading vision.  Centennial Mills is a test. Integrating parks and urbanism is not just about “business prosperity,” the Olmsteds wrote, it measures a city’s “intelligence, degree of civilization and progressiveness.”

No comments:

Post a Comment

Contributors